<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Being Random - Latest Comments in liquify &amp;ne; liquefy </title><link>http://beingrandom.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://beingrandom.disqus.com/liquify_ne_liquefy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:17:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: liquify &amp;ne; liquefy </title><link>http://beingrandom.tumblr.com/post/87623448#comment-7330464</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem; I just construed your usual &lt;u&gt;X ≠ Y&lt;/u&gt; model as X being common, improper spelling and Y as the proper one. No doubt that it's true within its own context.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicolai</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:17:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: liquify &amp;ne; liquefy </title><link>http://beingrandom.tumblr.com/post/87623448#comment-7330239</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder how many people will notice my run-on sentence...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: liquify &amp;ne; liquefy </title><link>http://beingrandom.tumblr.com/post/87623448#comment-7330225</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Liquify is a variant of liquefy, so it's not necessarily "wrong", but the original spelling is l-i-q-u-e-f-y.&lt;br&gt;Etymology: Fr liquefier &amp;lt; L liquefacere: see liquid &amp;amp; -fy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'll admit that I got a little picky with this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elizabeth</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>